Outcomes

Lets look at the outcome criteria (in the section 'successes and failures) Latchem et al. use. Thy include

This echoes what we find attacked in Klees (1995)

"Distance education systems, from a political economy perspective, have thus usually been seen as giving a second-class, inferior education to those allowed into education last, namely, those who are hardest to reach and frequently the most disadvantaged. To add insult to injury, cost-recovery efforts have usually been higher in distance education systems, so disadvantaged students have ended up paying more for their education than those in conventional schools (Oliveira 1988, Nettleton 1991). Moreover, the independent study nature of distance education lets fewer students through the education pipeline. Those who do not get through are often "cooled out" from higher expectations, and society is absolved of blame for not having given them a fair chance. Indeed, more broadly, distance education systems have been seen to help maintain the stability of unfair societies by legitimating what is only a pretense of equal opportunity. More directly, especially for authoritarian regimes, stability can be enhanced because, with distance education, students do not congregate and are therefore less likely to be a political force."
Klees, S. J. (1995). The Economics of Educational Technology. In M. Carnoy (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education. Oxford: Pergamon.