The goals of the course is to enable the student to be a competent partner in the process of setting up and managing economic aspects of distance education, both on institutional level as well as on course level (i.e. with regard to media choice).
At the end of the course students should have achieved the following objectives. The student
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London:
Routledge.
Rumble, G. (Ed.). (2004). Papers and debates on the costs and
economics of distance education and online learning (Vol. 7). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks-
und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
Rumble, G. (1997). The Costs and Economics of Open and Distance Learning.
London: Kogan Page.
NOTE:
Rumble (1997)
may be out of print. The new edition is not yet available. The most important
chapters will be made available online.
Rumble, G. (Ed.). (2004) will be
available at Missouri Bookshop
In general, journal articles and papers referenced in this Syllabus will be supplied online.
It is strongly recommended that students purchase the Publications Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th Ed.) and that they pay particular attention to these pages before, during and after the writing of any Assignments.
As noted below, the ability to write to APA standards is a Graduate School requirement. |
This course is only offered in the online mode. Students must be prepared to:
The 150 hours workload during the course consists of:
To the final grade of this course both, assignments, and participation to the conferences will contribute:
During the first week a number of issues will have to be addressed: Students will be introduce each other and will be given an outline of the course setup.
However, we proceed soon to the course content. What is the rationale behind the unprecedented expansion of education? Education can be seen as an investment with very real returns to the individual as well as to society as a whole. Individual demand rises and there seems little reason to discourage it. But trying to satisfy a mass demand for education, giving the scarcity of resources, leads to the question of the most cost-effective provision of education. Distance education seems to fit this bill. Using rational production techniques, including division of labor and the application of media and technologies, distance education may be seen as being capable of emulating the success of industrialized manufacture of high quality consumer goods.
This relation between the core theory of economics of education which suggests to view education as an investment ('Human Capital Theory'), the historically unprecedented worldwide postwar expansion of education, and the emergence of distance education sets the scene for the questions of this course.
In the second week students will be asked to do some group work. Students will collaborate to explore the expansion of education using the GED database. While this group work is not graded, participation is strongly recommended since it will allow students to become acquainted with the use of Excel spreadsheets required in the first assignment.
Management issues and objectives:
Required reading:
Perraton,
H. (2000). Introduction: golden goose and ugly duckling, Open
and distance learning in the developing world (pp. 4-9). London:
Routledge.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American
Economic Review, 51, 1-17.
Pritchett, L. (1999, December). Where
has all the education gone? World Bank. Retrieved November, 5, 2003, from
the World Wide Web: http://www.worldbank.org/research/growth/pdfiles/Where_r4.pdf
Additional reading:
Psacharopoulos,
G. (1995). The Profitability
of Investment in Education: Concepts and Methods: World Bank.
Peters, O. (1994). Distance education and industrial production: a comparative
interpretation in outline. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Otto
Peters on distance education: the industrialisation of teaching and learning (pp.
107-127). London: Routledge.
Group
task
At the end of module 1 students are to complete a group task. The
task will not be graded and affects the final grade only through its contribution
to the 25% of participation rating (cf. Grading above).
Special emphasis is given to the issues like capital costs, overheads and cost attribution of joint products.
Objectives:
Required readings:
Hülsmann,
T. (2004) Costing
open and distance learning (WBT)
Work through
the following sections:
- Drawing up a budget
- Elements of
cost-analysis
Rumble, G. (1997). The Costs and Economics of Open and Distance
Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Read through the
following sections:
- Overheads (pp.51-64)
- Attribution of
costs (pp. 65-73)
Additional reading:
Rumble, G. (1997). The Costs and Economics of Open and Distance Learning.
London: Kogan Page.
The following sections can be
seen as complementary to Hülsmann (2004):
- Budgets (pp.
7-12)
- The classification of resources (pp. 13-20)
- A basic framework
for analysing revenue costs (pp. 21-31)
- Volume and its relationship with
fixed and variable costs (32-41)
- The treatment of capital costs (42-50)
Assignment
At the end
of module 2 students are to submit an assignment that contributes 25% to the final
grade.
This module applies cost analysis to distance education institutions. Using 'cost per student' and 'cost per graduate' as an proxy indicator for cost-effectiveness we will examine the method of analyzing institutional cost-effectiveness. We review case study evidence for the claim of distance education being a cost-effective means of educational provision.
Management guidelines to monitor the cost-effectiveness of distance education are suggested.
Objectives
Required readings:
Hülsmann, T. (2004) Costing
open and distance learning (WBT)
Work through
the following sections:
- Cost-effectiveness of ODL
Laidlaw,
B., & Layard, R. (1974). Traditional versus Open University teaching method:
A cost comparison. Higher Education,
3, 439-468.
Rumble, G. (Ed.) (2004). Papers and debates
on the costs and economics of distance education and online learning (Vol. 7).
Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität
Oldenburg.
Read the following sections:
- Rumble, G. The competitive vulnerability of distance teaching Universities
(1992). (pp. 67-88)
- White, V. Responses to Greville Rumble's article 'The
competitive vulnerability of distance teaching universities'(1992). (pp. 89-92).
- Mugridge, I. Responses to Greville Rumble's article 'The competitive vulnerability
of distance teaching universities' (1992). (pp. 93-96).
- Keegan,
D. The competitive advantages of distance teaching universities (1994). (pp. 107-117).
- Rumble, G. The competitive vulnerability of distance teaching universities:
a reply (1994). (pp. 103-106).
- Rumble, G. Competitive vulnerability: an
addentum to the debate (1998). (pp. 107-117).
Additional
reading:
Levin, H. M. (1995). Cost-effectiveness Analysis. In M. Carnoy
(Ed.), Internation
al encyclopedia of economics of education, (pp. 381-386).Oxford:
Pergamon.
Assignment
At the end of module 3 students are to submit an assignment that contributes
25% to the final grade.
The cost-effectiveness
of distance education depends to a large extent on the appropriate media choice.
For the medium to be cost-effective it needs to be cost-efficient and effective.
Hence to which extent a medium contributes to effective teaching and learning
is a question which impacts on the issue of cost-effectiveness. Hence Module 4
re-visits the media equivalence hypothesis (MEH) and the question to which extent
course planners can be relaxed about the choice of the medium (because it makes
no difference or does not influence teaching and learning at all), or to which
extent it is important to make use of the various capabilities of a medium in
a given context.
Second, the module addresses the issue of costing media.
After some methodological considerations on how to cost educational media and
technologies and the introduction of 'cost per student learning hour' as
a measure to facilitate cost comparison, classify media are classified in two
major categories. In the first category 'resource media' are placed, which are
unidirectional and can be replicated as objects, e.g. books, cassettes,
CD-ROMs. They are more likely to generate economies of scale. Communication media
on the other hand (the second category) establish and sustain communication between
student and teacher/tutor, and are less prone to generate scale economies.
In this module we consider especially
the costs of resource media: print, ratio/ audio cassettes, television/video cassettes.
Objectives
Required readings:
Bates, A. W. (1995).
Technology, open learning and distance education. (pp. 33-60) London: Routledge.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering
Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4),
445-459.
Hülsmann, T.
(2004) Costing
open and distance learning (WBT)
Work through
the following sections:
Costing educational media: (i) Concepts;
(ii) Costing traditional media
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211.
Additional readings:
Hülsmann, T. (2000). The Costs of open learning: a handbook.
Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem der Carl von Ossietzky Universität
Oldenburg. (Chapter
1, Chapter
2, Case
study 1, Case
study 3, Case
study 9)
Perraton, H.
(1983). A Theory for Distance Education. In D. Sewart, Keegan, D., Holmberg, B.
(Ed.), Distance Education: International Perspectives. New York, London,
Canberra: St. Martin's Press; Croom Helm.
Assignment:
At the end of module 5 students are to submit an assignment that contributes 25
% to the final grade.
The
second part of the module addresses e-learning. E-learning (e-education, distributed
e-learning) integrates the different types of media often by unified Learning
Management Systems (LMS). But it makes a big difference in terms of cost structure
if digital media emphasize the information processing aspect of ICT (type-i, e.g.
CBTs) or the communication aspect (type-c, e.g. asynchronous seminars). The communication
intensive variants of distance education tend to loose DE's potential for scale
economies which has been the major rationale for its claim to be a more cost-effective
option of educational provision.
The module asks finally if and to which extent
the lost efficiencies (due to a reduced potential of scale economies) can be recovered.
It sees two main options: (i) increased use of learning objects; (ii) intensified
cooperation and the forming of alliances.
Objectives
Required
readings:
Bates, A.
W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London New York: Routledge.
Read the following sections:
- Bates,
A. W., Picard, J. (2005). Audio-, video- and Web-conferencing: Access and treaching
issues. In A. W. Bates (Ed.), Technology, e-learning and distance education. (pp.
175-192). London New York:: Routledge.
- Bates, A. W., Picard, J. (2005).
Audio-, video- and Web-conferencing: Costs and organizational issues. In A. W.
Bates (Ed.), Technology, e-learning and distance education. (pp. 193-209). London
New York: Routledge.
Hülsmann,
T. (2004) Costing
open and distance learning (WBT)
Work through
the following sections:
- Costing educational media: Costing distributed
e-learning
- Conclusions: Business models and models of cooperation
Lamberson,
M. (2003). Course management systems: Trapped content silos or sharing platforms?
In C. M. Gynn, Acker, S. R. (Ed.), Learning
Objects: Contexts and connections: The Ohio State University.
Rumble,
G. (Ed.) (2004). Papers and debates on the costs and economics of distance
education and online learning (Vol. 7). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks- und Informationssystem
der Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
Read
the following sections:
- Rumble, G. The costs and costing of
networked learning (2001). (pp. 139-162).
- Rumble, G. The costs of providing
student support services (2001). (pp. 163-174).
- Rumble, G. E-Education:
Whose Benefits, whose costs? (2001). (pp. 119-138).
Rumble,
G. & Latchem, C. (2004). Organisational models for distance and open learning.
In H. Perraton, Lentell, H. (Ed.), Policy for open and distance learning.
London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Whalen,
T., & Wright, D. (1999). 'Methodology for cost-benefit analysis of Web-based
tele-learning'. The American
Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 25-43.
Wiley,
D. (2003). The coming collision between automated instruction and social constructivism.
In C. M. Gynn, Acker, S. R. (Ed.), Learning
Objects: Contexts and connections: The Ohio State University.
Additional
readings:
Bernath, U., Hülsmann, T. (2004, 4-6 March). Low cost
high outcome approaches. Paper presented at the The Third EDEN Research Workshop
and International Conference: Supporting the Learner in Distance Education and
E-Learning, Oldenburg.
Bishop,
T., & SchWeber, C. (2001). UMUC's Online
MBA Program: A case study of cost-effectiveness and the implications for large-scale
Programs': Sloan Foundation.
Hülsmann,
T. (2004, 4-6 March). The two-pronged attack on learner support: costs and
the centrifugal forces of convergence. Paper presented at the Third EDEN Research
Workshop and International Conference: Supporting the Learner in Distance Education
and E-Learning, Oldenburg.
Assignment:
At the end of module 4 students are to submit an assignment that contributes 25
% to the final grade.