http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/zef/cde/media/readings/ati/cron.htm
(taken from: http://www.uqac.uquebec.ca/dse/3psy206/auteurs/cronbac.html)
The term "Aptitude-Treatment-Interaction" (ATI) has been coined during a presidential address of Cronbach on the general assembly of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1957: Cronbach referred to "ATI" for any kind of pedagogical and psychological research which examines the relation of individual abilities and aptitudes with the applicaion (or treatment) of different teaching methods and learning objectives.
If an individual differentiation of learning objectives (learner's goals) are concerned, Glaser (1972, 25) proposes a dynamical model of adaptation depicted in the following figure.
Figure 1: Dynamical model of adaptation to individual learning objectives according to (Glaser, 1972, 25).
Salomon (1974; 1979) proposed his supplantation hypothesis, a model which aims to compensate individual differences in pre-knowledge and abilities. Supplantation means to teach the way of thinking and problem solving strategies in order to solve a specific learning task. A general model of most of the ATI theories is that they aim to overcome learning obstacles or individual "disabilities". Therefore, most of the adaptation methods are not very useful if the learners do not show any learning problems.
Aptitude Treatment Interaction Research
by Barbara A. Nanney
URL http://sweeneyhall.sjsu.edu/depts/it/foothill226/edit226co/226_assign/lectures/lecture_2/ati.doc
Learning styles and navigation
AMERICAN INDIAN LEARNING STYLES SURVEY: AN ASSESSMENT OF TEACHERS KNOWLEDGE
by Karen Swisher
Source: The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, v.
13 pp. 59-77, Spring 1994.
URL http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu/miscpubs/jeilms/vol13/americ13.htm
Using Learning Styles to Adapt Technology for Higher Education
by Terry O'Connor
Source: Indiana State University, CLT Learning Styles Site
URL http://web.indstate.edu/ctl/styles/learning.html
Bastien, C. (1992). Ergonomics for hypermedia software. In A. Oliviera (Ed.), Hypermedia courseware: Structures of communication and intelligent help (pp. 183-187). New York: Springer.
Benjamin, L.T. (1988). A history of teaching machines. American Psychologist, 43(9), 703-712.
Chung, J. & Reigeluth, C.M. (1992). Instructional prescriptions for learner control. Educational Technology, 32, 14-20.
Corno, L. & Snow, R.E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 605-629). London: MacMillan.
Cope, P. & Simmons, M. (1994). Some effects of limited feedback on perfomance and problem-solving strategy in a Logo microworld. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 368-379.
Cronbach, L.J. (1967). How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In R.M. Gagné (Ed.), Learning and individual differences (pp. 42-58). Ohio: Columbus.
Cronbach, L.J. & Snow, R.E. (1977). Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. Report to the UOEC (Contract No. OEC4-6-061269-1217). San Francisco: Stanford University Press.
Crowder, N.A. (1959). Automating tutoring by means of instrinsic programming. In E.Galanter (Ed.), Automatic teaching: The state of art (pp. 109-116). New York: John Wiley.
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dowaliby, F.J. & Schumer, H. (1973). Teacher-centered versus student-centered mode of college classroom instruction is related to manifest anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 125-132.
Edwards, A.D.N. (1992). Redundancy and adaptability. In A.D.N. Edwards & J.L. Holland (Eds.), Multimedia interface design in education (pp. 145-155). New York: Springer.
Fischer, P.M. & Mandl, H. (1988). Improvement of the acqusition of knowledge by informing feedback. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 187-241). New York: Springer.
Flammer, A. (1990). Erfahrung der eigenen Wirksamkeit. Einführung in die Psychologie der Kontrollmeinung. Bern: Huber.
Flammer, A. (1995). Developmental analysis of control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 69-113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gagné, R.M. (1965). The conditions of learning and the theory of instruction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Glaser, R. (1972). Individuals and learning: The new aptitudes. Educational Researcher, 1, 5-13.
Glaser, R. (1977). Adaptive education: Individual diversity and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Leutner, D. (1992). Adaptive Lehrsysteme. Instruktionspsychologische Grundlagen und experimentelle Analysen. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Merill, M.D. (1975). Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions. AV Communication Review, 23, 217-226.
Merill, M.D. (1980). Learner control in computer based learning. Computers & Education, 4, 77-95.
Merill, M.D. (1988). Applying component display theory to the design of courseware. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 61-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nix, D. (1990). Should computers know what you can do with them? In D. Nix & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia. Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 143-162). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Salomon, G. (1972). Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interaction hypotheses. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237-343.
Salomon, G. (1974). What is learned and how it is taught. The interaction between media, message, task, and learner. In D.Olson (Ed.), Media and symbols, the forms of expression, communication and education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Salomon, G. (1979). Interaction of media, cognition, and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Skinner, B.F. (1965). Reflections on a decade of teaching machines. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learning, II (pp. 5-20). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Snow, R.E. (1962). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorow. Educational Psychologist, 27, 5-32.
Snow, R.E. (1977). Research on aptitudes: A process report. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of reserach in education (pp. 50-105). Itasca, Il: Peacock.
Snow, R.E. (1982). The training of intellectual aptitude. In D.K. Shulman & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased?. Norwood: Ablex.
Snow, R.E. & Swanson, J. (1992). Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment. Annual Review of psychology, 43, 583-626.
Stevens, J. (1992). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stolurow, L.M. & Davis, D. (1965). Teaching machines and computer based systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Teaching machines and programmed learning II (pp. 162-212). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Tennyson, R.D. & Christensen, D.L. (1988). MAIS: An intelligent learning system. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 247-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Individuality. Boston: Houghton & Mifflin.
Twidale, M. (1993). Redressing the balance: The advantages of informal evaluation techniques for intelligent learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4, 155-178.
Weber, G. (1995). Individual selection of examples in an intelligent learning environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7, 3-31.