COURSE DESCRIPTION

The course focuses on the role and types of student support within modern distance education systems. Student support is broadly defined to include all types of tutorial assistance including correspondence teaching, electronic conferencing, web-based and telephone teaching, as well as a broad range of orientation, information, advising, counselling, remedial, and guidance services. The role of administrative and registry services including admission, registration, prior learning assessment, and credit coordination will also be addressed. Students will be introduced to the many contextual factors which determine the development of a particular student support model, and will explore management issues such as decentralization of services, responding to student attrition, the importance of evaluation and applied research, and professional development for practitioners.
 
 

COURSE OBJECTIVES

At the conclusion of the course, students will be able to:

1. Explain the rationale for student services in modern distance education.
2. Describe the various student support functions.
3. Critically analyze issues in the provision of student support.
4. Identify the contextual factors which determine a student support model.
5. Apply particular contextual factors to planning for student support.
6. Develop a plan for the introduction of student services in a distance education system, including selection of components and delivery methods.
7. Develop a professional development plan for a particular student support system.
8. Recommend a management strategy for student support in a particular system.
9. Develop an evaluation plan for student support activities in a particular system.
10. Critically evaluate and use applied research results in planning student support services.

    Mills, R., and Tait, A. (Eds.). (1996). Supporting the Learner in Open and Distance Learning. London, UK.: Pitman Publishing.

    Sweet, R. (1993). Perspectives on distance education series: Student support services: Towards more responsive systems, Report on a Symposium on Student Support Services in Distance Education, Delhi, Vancouver, Canada: Commonwealth of Learning.

Additional readings as assigned.

COURSE REQUIREMENTS

This course is only offered in the online mode. Students must be prepared to:

• ensure technical access to WebTycho (the digital learning environment)
• invest an average of 10 hour workload in each week of the course.
• The total of 150 hours workload during the course consists of around:
  • 50 hours of reading,
  • 50 hours of active, visible participation in the discussion groups,
  • 50 hours for assignments.

The course will be completed by two individual essay-type assignments and a collaborative case study (study group work).

• The first assignment (annotated bibliography) must be submitted by October 9 (30 %).
• The second assignment (paper) must be submitted by November 10 (30 %).
• The collaborative case study must be submitted by December 18 (30 %)
• Online participation (10%)

A for 90 – 100% - Excellent
B for 80 – 89% - Good, meets Standard
C for 70 – 79% - Below Standard
F for 0 – 69% - Failure
 
 

The grade of "B" represents the benchmark for the Graduate School. It indicates that the student has demonstrated competency in the subject matter of the course, i.e., the student has fulfilled all course requirements on time, has a clear grasp of the full range of course materials and concepts, and is able to present and apply these materials and concepts in clear, reasoned, well organized and grammatically correct responses whether written or oral.

Only students who fully meet this standard and, in addition, who demonstrate exceptional comprehension and application of the course subject matter, merit an "A".

Students who do not meet the benchmark standard of competency fall within the "C" range or lower. They, in effect, have not met graduate level standards. Where this failure is substantial, they earn an "F".

The Grade Of "I" (Incomplete): The grade of "I" is exceptional and given only to students whose completed coursework has been qualitatively satisfactory but who have been unable to complete all course requirements because of illness or other extenuating circumstances beyond their control. The grade of "I" may be considered only for students who have completed at least fifty percent (50%) of the total coursework requirements and who have received a passing grade on all the coursework which they have completed. The instructor retains the right to make the final decision on granting a student's request for an "I", even though the student may meet the eligibility requirements for this grade.

Writing standards

Effective managers and leaders are also effective communicators. Written communication is an important element of the total communication process. The Graduate School recognizes and expects exemplary writing to be the norm for course work. To this end, all papers, individual and group, must demonstrate graduate level writing ability and comply with the format requirements of the Publications Manual of the American Psychological Association (latest ed.). Careful attention should be given to source citations, proper listing of references, representation of numbers, and the presentation of tables and figures.

Policy on Academic Integrity (Plagiarism)

"Plagiarism is the intentional or unintentional presentation of another person's idea or product as one's own. Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to the following: copying verbatim all or part of another's written work; using phrases, charts, figures, illustrations, or mathematical or scientific solutions without citing the source; paraphrasing ideas, conclusions, or research without citing the source; and using all or part of a literary plot, poem, film, musical score, or other artistic product without attributing the work to its creator. Students can avoid unintentional plagiarism by carefully accepted scholarly practices. Notes taken for papers and research projects should accurately record sources of material to be cited, quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and papers should acknowledge these sources in footnotes."

The penalties for plagiarism include a zero or a grade of "F" on the work in question, a grade of "F" in the course, suspension with a file letter, suspension with a transcript notation, or expulsion.

Note: Work submitted for this class must be your own, and it must be original to this course. If you have questions regarding this stipulator, please consult instructor.

Disabled Students

In accordance with the UMUC policy, any student who has a disability and is in need of classroom accommodations must inform the instructor of this need and, if he or she has not already done so, contact UMUC’s office of Veteran and Disabled Student Services at (301) 985-7258.
 
 

COURSE OUTLINE

The course is divided into three major units, each with an assignment (see below). The first unit addresses the context and various elements of learner support and the second focuses on planning and management issues. These first units are divided into major topics for discussion.  The third unit integrates the content from the first two through the analysis and development of case studies.
 

Unit 1: Context and Elements of Student Support (Aug 31 - Oct 9)

Unit 1.  Weeks 1 and 2: Introduction and Overview (Aug. 31 - Sept. 14)

Objectives:

1. Describe the theoretical frameworks, research findings, and other contextual issues which have contributed to the development of student support systems
2. Explain the rationale for student support in modern distance education
3. Describe the various student support functions

1. Overview of the course
2. Overview of types of student/models of student support
3. History and development of student support and its rationale in open distance learning
4. Theoretical frameworks and prevailing values: goals of student support

     Brindley, J.E.  (1995).   Learner services: Theory and practice.  In Distansutbildning i itveckling, Rapport nr. 11 (pp.23-34).  Umea, Sweden: University of Umea.

     Croft, M.  (1991).  Report on round table on student support services (pp. 1-56).  Vancouver, CANADA: The Commonwealth of Learning.

     Dillon, C.L., Gunawardena, C.N., and Parker, R.  (1992).  Learner support: The critical link in distance education.  Distance Education, 13(1), 29-45.

     Glennie, J.  (1996).  Towards learner-centred distance education in the changing South African context.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 19-33).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

     Robinson, B.  (1995).  Research and pragmatism in learner support.  In F. Lockwood (Ed.), Open and distance learning today (pp. 221-231).  London, UK: Routledge.

     Tait, A.  (1988).  Democracy in distance education and the role of tutorial and counselling services.  Journal of Distance Education, 3(1), 95-99.

     Tait, A.  (1995).  Student support in open and distance learning.  In F. Lockwood (Ed.), Open and distance learning today (pp.232-241).  London, UK: Routledge
 

Optional/Additional Readings:

     Duffy, T.M. & Jonassen, DH.E.  (Eds.).  (1992).  Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation.  Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

     Knowles, M.J.  (1980).  The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to androgogy (2nd Ed.).  New York: Cambridge University Press.
 

Unit 1.  Weeks 3 - 5: Elements of Student Support (Sept. 15 - Oct. 6)

    Topic 1. Tutoring and Teaching

 Objectives:

1. Explain the major theoretical approaches to tutoring and teaching in distance education
2. Describe the main methods and technologies for providing teaching and tutoring
3. Analyse the approaches to teaching and tutoring in institutions

1. The tradition of correspondence teaching
2. Residential schools and face-to-face components of ODL
3. Telephone tutoring
4. Audio- and video-conferencing/web-based teaching/electronic conferencing

     Garland, M.R.  (1995).  Helping students achieve epistemological autonomy.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 77-80).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

     Holmberg, B.  (1983).  Guided didactic conversation in distance education.  In D. Sewart,  D. Keegan, and B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 114-122).  London: Croom Helm.

     Keegan, D.  (1986).  Interaction and communication, (Chapter 6, pp.89-107).  In Keegan, D., The foundations of distance education.  Kent,UK.:  Croom Helm.

     Morgan, C., and Morris, G.  The student view of tutorial support: Report of a survey of Open University Education students.  Open Learning, 9(1), 22-33.

     Relan A and Gillani B. J.  (1997).  Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom:  Similarities and differences.  In Khan, B. (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 25–37).  New Jersey:  Educational Technology Publications.

     Romiszowski, A.  (1997).  Web-based distance learning and teaching: Revolutionary necessity or reaction to necessity?  In Khan, B. (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 91-111).  New Jersey:  Educational Technology Publications.

     Wolcott, L.L. (1995).  The distance teacher as reflective practitioner.  Educational Technology, January/February Issue, 39-43.

Additional Readings:

     Moore, MG.  (1993).  Theory of transactional distance.  In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38).  London, UK: Routledge.

     Roberts, J., Brindley, J.E., and Spronk, B.  (1998).  Learning on the information highway: A learner's guide to the technologies.  Toronto, CANADA:  Office of Learning Technologies/ Cheneliere/McGraw-Hill.

     Sweet, R.  (1993).  Part I:  Student support services: Direction for change.  In Sweet R. (Ed.), Perspectives on distance education series:  Student support services: Towards more responsive systems, Report on a Symposium on Student Support Services in Distance Education, Delhi, (pp.1-40).  Vancouver, CANADA:  Commonwealth of Learning.
 

     Topic 2. Advising and Counselling

 Objectives:

1. Describe the different types of services which fall under the general heading of advising and counselling
2. Explain the goal of advising and counselling services

1. Orientation and information (enquiry) services
2. Academic advising
3. Counselling
   career guidance
   personal counselling
4. Learning and study skills assistance
5. Student advocacy and student charters

    Bowser, D., and Race, K.  (1991).  Orientation for distance education students: What is its worth?  Distance Education, 12(1), 109-122.

    Brindley, J.E., and Fage, J.  (1991).  Counselling in open learning: Two institutions face the future.  Open Learning, 7(3), 12-19.

    Manning, E.  (1997).  The preparation of students for distance learning: Two very different approaches from a wider European perspective.  In Tait, A. (Ed.), Collected Conference Papers, The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 114-119).  Cambridge, UK.: The Open University.

    Nilsson, V.  (1989).  Voluntary academic assessment to enhance independent learning.  In Tait, A. (Ed.),  Conference Papers, Interaction and Independence: Student Support in Distance Education and Open Learning, (pp. 167-181).  Cambridge, U.K.: The Open University.

    O'Rourke, J.  (1995).  A piece of the jigsaw: Student advising in distance education.  In Tait, A. (Ed.), Collected conference papers, Sixth Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp.136-145).  Cambridge, UK.: The Open University.

    Phillips, M., and Scott, P. (1999).  Multimedia advice, guidance and counselling on the Web: A prototype learner's guide.  In Tait, A. (Ed.), Collected Conference Papers, The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 121-130).  Cambridge, UK.: The Open University.

    Rhys, S.  (1988).  Study skills and personal development.  Open Learning, 3(2), 40-42.

    Simpson, O.  (1992).  Specifying student support services in the OU - the so-called Student Charter.  Open Learning, 7(2), 57-59.

Additional readings:

    Brindley, J.E.  (1995).  Learners and learner services: The key to the future in distance education.  In J.M. Roberts and E.M. Keough (Eds.), Why the information highway: Lessons from open and distance learning (pp. 102-125).  Toronto: Trifolium Books Inc.

    Tallman, F.D.  Satisfaction and completion in correspondence study: The influence of instructional and student-support services.  The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 43-57.
 

       Topic 3: Library, Registry, and Other Administrative Support Services

 Objectives:

1. Describe the different types of services which fall under the general heading of library, registry, and other administrative support services
2. Explain the goal of library, registry, and other administrative support services

1. Library and information services
2. Registry
   recruitment
   admission
   prior learning assessment
   credential assessment
   credit coordination
   course registration
3. Course materials

    Granger, D., and Benke, M.  (1998).  Supporting learners at a distance from inquiry through completion.  In C.C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education, (pp. 127-137).  Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

    King, T.J.  (1995).  The identification of high dropout risk distance education students by the analysis of student records data.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 98-101).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    Phillips, S.E.  (1995).  The Commonwealth of Learning student record management system.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 437-440).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    Stephens, K., Unwin, L., and Bolton, N.  (1997).  The use of libraries by postgraduate distance learning students: A mismatch of expectations.  Open Learning, 12(3), 25-33.

     Wong, A.T.  (1997).  Valuing diversity: Prior learning assessment and open learning.  In Tait, A. (Ed.), Collected Conference Papers, The Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, (pp. 208-216).  Cambridge, UK.: The Open University.

Additional Readings:

    Bolton, N., Unwin, L., and Stephens, K.  (1998).  The use of libraries by postgraduate distance learning students: whose responsibility?   Open Learning, 13(1), 3-8.

    Bazillion. R., and Braun, C.  (1992).  Technology and library users automation and outreach: Library services to off-campus students.  Journal of Distance Education, 7(2), 67-75.

    Cavenagh, T., and Lingham, B.  (1994).  Library services for external postgraduates and overseas students.  Distance Education, 15(1), 112-152.

    Fage, J., and Mayes, R.  (1995).  Monitoring learners' progress.  In R. Mills and A. Tait, Supporting the learner in open and distance learning.  London, UK.: Pitman Publishing.
 

Unit 1 Assignment:

At the end of Unit 1 (Oct 6) students must submit an Annotated Bibliography of the required readings. This consists of a short summary including any evaluative comments (e.g. the value of the article or chapter) for each of the required readings for Unit 1. The summaries should be no longer than about 3 to 5 lines for each reading.  The grade for this assignment will contribute 30% to the final grade.
 
 

Unit 2: Planning and Managing Student Support Systems (Oct 7 - Nov 12)

Unit 2.  Week 6-7:  Designing Services to Meet Needs: Learner Characteristics and Special Groups (Oct. 7 - Oct. 20)

Objectives:

1. Analyse the importance of learner characteristics for designing student support
2. Describe the major client groups served by distance education
3. Explain the ways in which a learner support system can be tailored to serve specific client groups

1. Learner characteristics
2. Gender issues
3. Learners with special needs
4. Indigenous groups
5. Prison programs
6. Rurally isolated learners
7. Workplace programs

    Bilston, B.  (1996).  Supporting older learners in open and distance learning.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 165-176).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

    Evans, T.  (1994).  Learners social and educational backgrounds, (Chapter 2, pp. 22-28); and Endframes: uncovering the diversities of learners' contexts, (Chapter 9, pp. 122-133).  In Evans, T., Understanding learners in open and distance education. London, UK.:  Kogan Page.

    Hipp, H.  (1997).  Women studying at a distance: What do they need to succeed?  Open Learning, 12(2), 41-49.

    Morgan, A.  (1995).  Adult change and development: learning and people's lives.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 1 (pp. 319-322).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

 Sanchez, I., and Gunawardena, C.N.  (1998).  Understanding and supporting the culturally diverse distance learner.  In C.C. Gibson, (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 47-64).  Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

Additional Readings:

    Kirkup, G.  (1996).  The importance of gender.   In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 146-164).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

    Leach, J.  (1996).  Learning in practice: support for professional development.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 101-126).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

    Spronk, B.  (1995) Appropriating learning technologies: Aboriginal learners needs, technologies and practices.  In J.M. Roberts and E.M. Keough (Eds.), Why the information highway: Lessons from open and distance learning (pp. 77-101).  Toronto: Trifolium Books Inc.

    Stahmer, A.E.  (1995).  Learners in the workplace.  In J.M. Roberts and E.M. Keough (Eds.), Why the information highway: Lessons from open and distance learning (pp. 41-59).  Toronto: Trifolium Books Inc.

    Tait, A.  (2000).  Planning student support for open and distance learning. Open Learning, (in press).

    Thompson, M.M.  (1998).  Distance learners in higher education.  In C.C. Gibson, (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 9-24).  Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

    Worth, V.  (1996).  Supporting learners in prison.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 177-190).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

Unit 2.  Weeks 8-10: Management and Organization of Student Support Services (Oct. 23 - Nov. 12)

    Topic 1.  Setting Goals, Planning, and Consideration of Organizational Structures

Objectives:

1. Describe the process for identifying goals for student support within distance education
2. Identify the management challenges which are specific to student support in distance education
3. Analyse the planning and management processes which facilitate the delivery of support to students

1. Defining the goals of student support
   congruence with institutional mandate and culture
2. Strategic planning, priority setting, and budget management
3. Organizational structures
   centralization v. decentralization of services
   designing study centres, computer labs, and other facilities support

    Paul, R.  (1990).  Managing at a distance: Regional networks and off-campus tutors (Chapter 7, pp. 99 – 118).  In R.H. Paul, Open learning and open management: Leadership and integrity in distance education.  London, UK.:  Kogan Page.

    Reid, J.  (1995).  Open learning centres: Theory and reality – institutional and learner perspectives.    In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 190-193).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    Rumble, G.  (1992).  Strategic Planning, (Chapter 3, pp. 43 – 47).  In Rumble, G., The management of distance learning systems.  Paris, FR.: UNESCO/ International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Sewart, D.  (1993). Student support systems in distance education. Open Learning, 8(3), 3-12.

    Sweet, R.  (1993).  Part I:  Student support services: Direction for change.  In Sweet R. (Ed.), Perspectives on distance education series:  Student support services: Towards more responsive systems, Report on a Symposium on Student Support Services in Distance Education, Delhi, (pp.1-40).  Vancouver, CANADA:  Commonwealth of Learning.

Additional Readings:

    Mills, R.  (1996).  The role of student centres in open and distance education:  A glimpse of the future.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 73-87).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

   Paul, R.  (1990).  Leadership, integrity and the future (Chapter 11, pp. 169-189).  In R.H. Paul, Open learning and open management: Leadership and integrity in distance education.  London, UK.:  Kogan Page.
 

    Topic 2.  Staff and Staff Development

 Objectives:

1. Identify the major issues and challenges specific to the management of staff in the context of student support in distance education
2. Describe the contributions which professional or staff development can make to the goals of learner support within the ODL context

1. Staffing
   roles and qualifications
2. Performance evaluation/professional development
   needs assessment and goal setting
   staff development

    Forster, A., and Hewson, L.  (1998).  Universities learning:  The lure of the net.  In C. Latchem and F. Lockwood (Eds.), Staff development in open and flexible learning (pp. 221 – 231).  London, UK.: Routledge.

    Gunawardena, C., and Zittle, R.  (1998).  Faculty development progammes in distance education in American higher education.  In C. Latchem and F. Lockwood (Eds.), Staff development in open and flexible learning (pp. 105 – 114).  London, UK.:  Routledge.

    Lewis, R.  (1998).  Staff development in conventional institutions moving towards open learning.  In C. Latchem and F. Lockwood (Eds.), Staff development in open and flexible learning, (pp. 23-32).  London, UK.: Routledge.

    Sewart, D.  (1998).  Tuition and counselling:  Supporting teachers for competitive advantage.  In C. Latchem and F. Lockwood (Eds.), Staff development in open and flexible learning, (pp. 148-156).  London, UK.: Routledge.

    Watts, S.  (1995).  Quality assurance in regional centres.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 296-299).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

Additional Readings:

    Sweet, R.  (1993).  Part I:  Student support services: Direction for change.  In Sweet R. (Ed.), Perspectives on distance education series:  Student support services: Towards more responsive systems, Report on a Symposium on Student Support Services in Distance Education, Delhi, (pp.1-40).  Vancouver, CANADA:  Commonwealth of Learning.
 

    Topic 3.  Quality Assurance, Evaluation and Research

Objectives:

1. Explain the rationale for the use of quality assurance, evaluation, and applied research for student support services in distance education
2. Identify the major barriers to quality assurance, evaluation, and research in student support in distance education
3. Describe the major approaches to quality assurance and evaluation in student support services

1. Quality assurance and setting service standards
2. Evaluating services: approaches to data collection
3. Using applied research and developing an iterative approach

    Brindley, J.E.  (1995).  Measuring quality in learner services; Building towards the future.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 49-52).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    Calder, J.  (1994). The nature of evaluation, (Chapter 1, pp. 15 –29); and  Student recruitment and support services, (Chapter 6, pp. 101 –108).  In J. Calder, Programme evaluation and quality: A comprehensive guide to setting up an evaluation system.  London, UK.: Kogan Page.

    Paul, R.  (1990).  Managing for success:  Learner interaction and independence  (Chapter 6, pp. 76 – 98).    In R.H. Paul, Open learning and open management: Leadership and integrity in distance education.  London, UK.:  Kogan Page.

    Tait, A.  (1997).  The importance of context in quality assurance in distance education.  In A. Tait (Ed.), Quality assurance in distance education: International case studies (pp. 1-8).  Vancouver, CANADA:  Commonwealth of Learning.

    Thorpe, M.  (1996).  Issues of evaluation.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 222-234).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

Additional Readings:

    Jegede, O.J., Fraser, B., and Fisher, D.  (1995).  The development and validation of a distance and open learning environment scale.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 254-257).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    McCollum, A., Calder, J., Ashby, A., Thorpe, M., and Morgan, A.  (1995).  Quality and learning effectiveness in vocational education.  In Sewart, D. (Ed.), 17th World Conference for Distance Education:  One World Many Voices: Quality in Open and Distance Learning: Volume 2 (pp. 141-149).  Milton Keynes, UK: International Council for Distance Education and The Open University.

    Mills, R., and Paul, R.H.  (1993).  Putting the student first: Management for quality in distance education.  In T. Evans, and D. Nation. (Eds.), Reforming open and distance education (pp. 113-129).  London, UK.: Kogan Page.

     Thorpe, M.  (1992).  Tuition, (Chapter 4, pp. 61 – 86); and Counselling and learner progress (Chapter 5, pp. 88 –117).  In M. Thorpe, Evaluating open and distance learning, 2nd edition.  Harlow, UK.:  Longman.
 

 Unit 2 Assignment:

At the end of Unit 2 (Nov 12) students must submit a paper (10-12 pages, maximum 3000 words) on a special topic in student support including but not limited to any of the topics covered in the course.  The paper should take a position on a particular issue or critique a position taken by an author or authors from the readings, and support the argument with references from the relevant literature.  Sample topics will be provided.  The grade for this paper will contribute 30% to the final grade.
 
 

Unit 3: Developing a Model of Student Support (Nov 13 - Dec 18)

 Unit 3.   Case Studies (Nov. 13 - Dec. 18)

 Objectives:

1. Author a case study including the information relevant to designing a student support system
2. Design a student support system appropriate to a particular case study, addressing the needs, challenges, and opportunities, and working within resource and budget limitations
3. Critically analyze the strengths and weakness of student support systems which have been designed to address a particular context

1. Review of contextual factors
   institutional mandate and culture/goals of support system
   learner characteristics/geography
   resources and infrastructure/skills and technology availability
   applied research/existing data
2. Sample case studies
3. Case Studies - using contextual factors to plan and develop models of student support
   student presentations and critiques

    Brindley, J.E.  (1995).  Learners and learner services: the key to the future in distance education.  In J.M. Roberts, and E.M. Keough (Eds.), Why the information highway: Lessons from open and distance learning (pp. 102-125).  Toronto: Trifolium Books Inc.

    Brindley, J.E., and Paul, R.H.  (1996).  Lessons from distance education for the university of the future.  In R. Mills, and A. Tait (Eds.), Supporting the learner in open and distance learning (pp. 43-55).  London, UK: Pitman Publishing.

    Tait, A.  (2000).  Planning student support for pen and distance learning. Open Learning, (in press).

Case Studies for Discussion:

    Sweet, R. (1993).  Part II: Case studies: Indira Gandhi National Open University (pp. 45-51); Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University (pp. 53-58); Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University (pp. 63-74); and Sukkothai Thammathirat Open University (pp. 91-96).  In Sweet R. (Ed.), Perspectives on distance education series:  Student support services: Towards more responsive systems, Report on a Symposium on Student Support Services in Distance Education, Delhi.  Vancouver, CANADA:  Commonwealth of Learning.

    Nonyongo, E.P., and Ngengebule, A.T.  (1998).   Selected case studies:  University of Botswana (pp.33-51); Lesotho Distance Teaching Centre (pp. 67-83); South Africa Committee for Higher Education (SACHED) Trust (pp. 116-129); and University of South Africa (UNISA) (pp. 154-176).  In Learner support services: Case studies of DEASA member institutions. Pretoria, SA.:  University of South Africa.
 

 Unit 3 Assignment:

At the end of Unit 3 (Dec 18) students must submit a collaborative case study.  For this purpose, students will work in small study groups during Unit 3.  Each group will develop a two-part case study.  Part I (5-6 pages, maximum 1500 words) will describe a distance education situation based on real life/work situations and/or readings.  It will include details about the educational provider, students, subject matter, and context.  Part II (10-12 pages, maximum 3000 words) of the case study will describe an appropriate student support system for the educational context presented, including a rationale for the choices made.  Each group case study will be awarded a grade which will be applied to each student in the group.  The grade for the case study will contribute 30% to the final grade for the course.